Follow by Email

Monday, April 20, 2015

Child Centered Reports - Be Wary

What to be aware of:

Therapist's like the one's described in this article are to be challenged head on.  Court's in NH and across the country are accepting reports that have no merit.  

Elise Bon-Rudin EdD  ***BEWARE***

Ms. Bon-Rudin has a habit of creating bias reports for courts and/or DCYF assessment's on child(ren), not only are they negligent; Therapist's like Ms. Bon Rudin simply lacked the education to make such a report in the first place. 

What courts, are neglecting to look at is the methodologically involved in the reports submitted.  Therapist's like Bon-Rudin who only have a degree in education, are not psychologists, nor are they forensic psychologists; as such, they  take their clients information at face value. Which means they do not look for the contributing factors nor do they validate the information they are receiving. Example a child may say they get great grades, but their report card may reflect something completely different.  This therapist only reports what she heard not what she confirmed. 

Evidence that exist's in parental alienation cases, stockholm syndrome and other cases that require establishing whether or not the child is accurately reporting the alleged event; are completely overlooked. 

Simply, the report by these limitedly trained individuals lacks "fact finding" different attitudes different goals, the conflicts of this is describe more here. Collateral sources such as teachers, employers, physicians, or other therapists involved and information obtained from records or other sources is not even thought of in these reports and/or is blatantly ignored.  

When one parent says they do not want you to check with another physician who is actually seeing the child and other parent; that should be a red flag to step away from the case under simple ethics, yet Bon-Rudin has no ethics.  

Teacher's like William P. McIntosh at Pennichuck and Lori Ayotte Wilson McIntosh, Nashua North H.S.  know how to use DCYF and therapist's to their advantage.  A huge number of cases with DCYF show they have been involved in their students cases more than the average teacher. Red Flag? No. But it should be for the couple whose marital affair was reported by children at Fairgrounds in 2000 and resulted in the Nashua School Board keeping it under-raps and simply splitting them into two different schools.  Moral Issue, both were married to other people at the time the middle school aged children reported their behavior. 

To compound the problems surrounding custody is the fact that Judges are not continuous on the same case and refuse to educated themselves on the case before them; and more often then not they simply do not even read the motions in front of them. How to deal with this nationwide issue is better described by this attorney

Example of Issue's that develop & the truth of the attorney report: In this case the father handed in a Bon-Rubin report, red flag he did so - a year and half after it was done.  

Yet when pointed out to the court, Judge Introcasco accepted it without giving the mother an opportunity to cross exam the writer.

When it was shown that Bon-Rudin did not do the research to come to the conclusions she wrote, Judge Introcasco simply said she doesn't accept exhibits with motions. Yet upon accepting the case for a hearing she did not write with the exception of prayer A to accept the exhibits in support of the motion.    

Tip: Anytime a response motion comes in with the name of a reporter without a report - subpoena the writer and be prepared to show the following: 

Ross vs. Gadwah get the doctors notes they often do not match the report as shown in cases with the above and below players.  

Dr. Vonderheide 

Look at the Doctors background Bon-Rubin has a degree with no training from Harvard and in fact a degree that is questionable and one which Harvard stopped granting in 2013 

Vonderheide's conflict of interest lies in the fact that she is on the mental health board and has proven to be immune to judgments against her in at least 5 cases known to this writer. Check out how their own children act or talk in pubic. Do they want to grow up to be like them or someone else?

Often the only way to get these self-absorbed therapist's removed from your child's care is to start a civil case against them.Win or lose they still have to pay for an attorney and remove themselves from your child's care and sometimes it's just enough to have the piece of mind when you know they are ignoring your child's best interests. 

Trying to get a Judge or Marital Master off your case? Hell, file a civil suit you probably won't win. But,

It's worth the couple hundred to simply get rid of them if they won't recuse themselves and the administrator of Court's or Review Board won't do anything about them.  

If enough of us continue to show we're fed up with the NH and in fact United States Family Court Legal System; soon they will simply have to replace their friends. 

The Report itself what to be aware of ...

Check the report line by line 

How many times did they meet? For how long 15 min 50?

In this case just twice alone with the child, once with his father and once with the Step-Mother and once solely with the father/stepmother each meeting less than 50 minutes. 

How long in between the written report and the parent seeking it actually submitting it to the court? 

In this case it was over year so if a child didn't want visits isn't the father remiss for not bringing it to the courts attention? Judge Introcaso says it doesn't matter. Big Surprise.  Julie climbed her way to the bench by working as Disciplinary Counsel for New Hampshire Supreme Court's Attorney Discipline Office, served as a member of the hearings committee and the Professional conduct committee for several years. She's use to playing in the old boys game and anyone who has filed a complaint in those departments will tell you that nothing was done.  She apparently took that you can't touch me attitude to the bench with her. 

Did the parties involve purposefully decide not to involve other therapist's, teachers or other actors that were directly involved with the case? 

Did the pursuer of said report negate to provide the most current GAL information and/or other physician information? Was said GAL even called? 

Does the report relay vague unsupported conclusions examples: appears slightly younger or more mature but fails to articulate the difference?

Does it say the child has strong peer relationships without cross-referencing with another fact finder?

Does it indicate nervousness in answering questions when asked in front of one parent or another?

Does it say the child gets good grades but failed to even review a report card? 

Look up the testing depicted, is it a free internet test as in the case described above; versus one that was purchased or developed especially for the interview requested and legal problem to be address? 

Gather insurance records to show what prior treatment was for and compare to the reports findings. 

For example: do records indicate a child is being treated for depression; yet the report by a Bon-Rudin indicates that there is no depression when all past reports show there is. 

Does the report state with specificity what the child perceives are the relationship problems?

Do other reports by physicians who actually met with a parent and child show that there is no reason for them not to see each other?  

Did the GAL actually do their job and meet with the child and each parent independently?

Was there domestic violence against one parent?

In one case the Father plead guilty to attempted strangulation of his former wife, in front of Marital Master Love, who then struck down the wife's restraining order; because the mother drop kicked him. Asking the court why an abuser is left with the if and when the victim can see her child, is a good starting point.

You have to start asking what is wrong with the New Hampshire Court System and Family Court's across the United States, the United Nations and the World knows they ignore children's rights.  

When repeated interference with visitation is shown over and over and the Judges refuse to hold the person in contempt; you have to ask yourself do I really live in America? The country that is suppose to protect and defend all of it's citizens if you read this blatant accounting of Saudi Arabia, life. You'd think you were there. 

No comments:

Post a Comment