Translate

Showing posts with label Interference in Custody. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Interference in Custody. Show all posts

Wednesday, May 23, 2012

Realities of Child Protection Agency's US Start to Unravel

American people are not evil. Given information, they will do the right thing. But they're not given the information. Tim Robbins

“I want to make sure that every parent is able to raise their child, regardless of their color, regardless of how much money they make – we shouldn’t be penalizing women because they’re struggling financially by taking away their children – that’s outrageous!!!! And Look at the harm it’s done to the child,” said Rep. Clarke.

Read more: http://www.wxyz.com//dpp/news/local_news/investigations/congressman-wants-us-attorney-general-to-investigate-michigan-child-protective-services#ixzz1vhHITeWX

To Contact Congressman Clarke in Detroit, MI 48226 Phone: (313) 962-7700 Fax: (313) 962-7710Washington, DC 20515 Phone: (202) 225-2261 Fax: (202) 225-5730.

Call give your story; tell him to keep pushing and then contact your congressmen and senators and tell them if they want to be re-elected they better move with the flow. Click here to get their information; http://www.usa.gov/Contact/Elected.shtml

ALSO IN DETROIT – "In an effort to protect the rights of children, the American Civil Liberties Union of Michigan filed a federal lawsuit today asking a judge to strike down a state law that allows law enforcement officials to remove children from their parents’ custody without proving that the child is in immediate danger."

Read more here: http://www.aclumich.org/issues/press-releases/2011-03/1528

America and other's like Lincoln once said "I am a firm believer in the people. If given the truth, they can be depended upon to meet any national crisis. The great point is to bring them the real facts." Throughout this blog I have given you the facts about the child protection system in the United States especially New Hampshire and Massachusetts our children are not being protected the more people that push for accountability and change the faster it will happen! 

Saturday, May 19, 2012

Parent's Pro Se, How, What, Discovery, Due Process, Legal Research Help?

"Defeat is not the worst of failures. Not to have tried is the true failure." George Edward Woodberry  

When dealing with Child Protection Services in any State - Parent's may need to request the following information to fight their case; Below is a letter formatted to request discovery; the body can also be used in  a MOTION FOR DISCOVERY PRIOR TO THE HEARING THE COURT WILL BASE IT'S FINDINGS ON. Request as soon as you have notice of a hearing.

Under Crawford vs. Washington you are entitled to know your accuser and/or in NH Ross vs. Gadwah and your 5th and/or 14th Constitutional Amend. Rights and/or other case, state, and constitutional rights - parent's are entitled to information a fact finder will use in determining the fate of their child; this is just an example of what a parent in this situation may need to understand and obtain to see what they are up against and to disprove the States assertions. 

It is not meant as legal advice and the writer/dmvc takes no responsibility for any flaws it may have; others are welcome to insert their thoughts and opinion's to further the argument that parents without court appointed attorneys and/or the resources to get a good or any attorney, are in fact in need of resources that an attorney would have access and training to do. Note DCYF can be replaced by CPS or whatever your state titles their department of Child Protection Services as.

Page 1.

Name
Address
Phone
Email



 Court COUNTY,                                              MOTION and/or NOTICE FOR PRODUCTION
 Name  of Court                                                        
                                                                                     OF DOCUMENTS AND THINGS             

  Docket No.


Parent's Name, Pro Se, Plaintiff v. State of Whatever State, Department of Health and Human Services, Division of Children Youth and Families or State Name NH = Department of Children Youth and families; court case name is on paperwork received from court or division that a case is open in. 

TO:      Child Protection Department or Attorney General Office if a Civil Suit or edit for a specific
             Doctor or party; such as police, CASA, Guardians etc. their Address or use the court title
             format on any sample motions they have online;          
 DATE: May 19, 2011


            PLEASE TAKE NOTICE that the Parent, acting pro se, pursuant to the Rules of the Court,  hereby requests that the State make available to the Parent, for the purposes of copying and inspecting the following documents and items in the possession, custody or control of the State, its officers, employees, agents, attorneys, insurance and/or representatives: All Items set forth on the attached schedule “A”.

Page 2.
SCHEDULE “A” NOTICE FOR PRODUCTION by June 01, 2012 (put in a due date; check state child protection statute or give at least 10 days some states only require 5 days)

1.      A copy of any and all written statements obtained from Parent, Child and/or 3rd parties, DCYF Employees as it relates to this case including but Not limited to: letters, notes, memoranda, and emails from all parties not limited to the Parents, CASA, and 3rd party providers.

2.      A copy of any and all written documents containing oral statements by the parent, child, 3rd parties and/or DCYF Employees including all file memos, notes, dictation, memoranda or such documents’ taken by Social workers or any other agents, representatives or any police officers assisting in the investigation of the original matter that would contain such oral statements.   

3.      Copies of the entire file of DCYF (excluding any attorney/client privileged information) including but not limited to: any and all 3rd party information, all referral forms and all dictation of the child assessment worker(s) and ongoing social worker(s) assigned to this case.

4.      Copies of all reports made by police officers, other law enforcement officers or any other person concerning this matter to the extent that said reports are in the possession, custody or control of DCYF including those made by the Nashua Visitation Center and/or any other visitation sources. 

5.      Copies of any photographs depicting any injury to the child involved in this matter.
 

6.      Copies of any photographs or video tapes or audio tapes that DCYF has in their possession, custody or control regarding this matter.

7.      Copies of any and all reports, records, evaluations or the like, of any treating physicians, psychologists, psychiatrists, counselors, evaluators or hospitals pertaining to the child, that DCYF has in their possession, custody or control.

8.      Copies of any tangible evidence that DCYF used at trial and/or will seek to introduce at the review of this matter.

9.      Copies of any and all written documents of any sort that DCYF has introduced to the court and those they will seek to introduce.  

10.  Copies of any video tapes, audio tapes or recordings made of the child and/or parent[s], pertaining to the investigation and any petition(s) in this matter.

11.  Copies of any written statements of all potential witnesses and copies of reports containing the oral statements of all potential witnesses, whether or not the State intends to call or subpoena said witnesses in this matter.
 
12.  Any written and/or audio, video statements, of or by the Minor Child;  

13.  Any written, audiotaped or videotaped statements of witnesses and/or Parents to the alleged occurrence.


The request is due within 10 days of receipt; it is not grounds for objection that the information sought may be inadmissible at the trial if the information sought appears reasonably calculated to lead to the discovery of admissible evidence.

 Wherefore, the accused respectfully requests that this Honorable Court:

A. Grant this Motion for Discovery;

B. Grant Such further relief as may be deemed just and equitable.


and/or skip wherefore it not a motion

Respectfully,
x
xSign name here
x
Parents Name
Address
Phone Number
email

The Research skills of paralegals are typically deemed denied in every state to Pro Se litigants for the fear of being accused of the unauthorized practice of law by lawyers and bar associations that do not want the public to have access to these individuals ; however, if a paralegal is simply asked to build a Motion or research case law and statutory law surrounding a specific fact pattern  and or lay out a fact pattern in a manner that gives a reader a clear picture of what did and didn't occur - that is not legal advice that's research and legal writing everything done for an attorney should be available to the Pro Se litigant, it is always wise for the Pro Se litigant then to take their case build up to an attorney for review "called bundled services in most states" where you only need the attorney to perform part of the services not handle the whole case and charge you $75 + for a paralegal that maybe an intern earning $ 0 or less than $20. 

Once an attorney receives the information he will determine and rework what is usable and give the client a status; for the Pro Se parent using this resource, they must decide on their own what they will use as well.

Paralegals assisting in this area produce results such as the above and know where to look to obtain information for fact gathering, evidence and the law; however, they can not give legal advice such as: "I think this is the best way to go, they can only give out the research they were ask to retrieve on a specific case, matter, person, or subject of law and they can not represent you in court and argue your case in front of a Judge."


"Always bear in mind that your own resolution to succeed is more important than any other."  Abraham Lincoln 






Thursday, April 5, 2012

Memory Engineering - Intentional Interference in Parental Custody - DCYF - The CIA - Due Process -

What the hell *$%@ is memory engineering? Can and do people present rewards and punishments to control peoples behavior. Of Course parent's do it all the time they reward their children when they go a good job in school they punish them by taking away computer time for bad behavior hitting another etc. By systematically rewarding a behavior, you could reinforce it.

Now take into consideration that Child Protective Services was created, in 1835, by the Humane Society (yes the one for animals) who founded the National Federation of Child Rescue agencies to investigate child maltreatment. In the late-19th century, private child protection agencies were modeled after existing animal protection organizations to advocate for children's welfare.Pecora et al. (1992), pp. 230-31; Petr (1998), p. 126.

So lets say we are training a dog to do tricks - the human society advocates systematically rewarding a behavior, to reinforce it. So did the theory behind "Gardner's" Parental Alienation Syndrome really only come about say "20" years ago? The answer would have to be NO, Child Protection Services workers advocate systematically rewarding a Child's behavior, to reinforce it. This brings us to the damage caused by those corrupt individuals which include some teachers to alter children's memory's.  How do they do that exactly?

Unfortunately, I have a very real scene that shows that while we reinforce good behaviors and that's normal - if we want a child to side with one parent over the other and the Father tells the child that you can not participate in your favorite sport of Track and Field because you "have to see" your Mother; or that you will not be able to come to our Summer home because you "have to see" your Mother; this now becomes a form of Child Abuse because you are systematically penalizing a child's behavior for wanting to see his mother (and/or viseversa) and then you are enforcing it by penalizing a child for wanting to see another parent. Children take their cues about how they should act, speak and react from the people who influence them the most; their parents. In the above scenario the Father. Now what is a child suppose to do it he attends the same school his Father teaches at? If that same father further limits this child's contact with the world around him by say not allowing him/her to give out their home phone number and/or  not allowing a cell phone; how does this child communicate with friends and realize that this is not rational behavior?

This is a type of programming that happens in many abductions of young children and it is INTENTIONAL INTERFERENCE with the parents relationship with that child.  Where does it stop? How does this child get to bond with his other parent, when the Courts give a teacher extra credit for simply being a teacher and that they couldn't possibly be brainwashing a child as presented and verified by others? Now, take a look at teachers across this country simply GOOGLE "teacher arrested" unfortunately these individuals in conjunction with the Child Protection Service Workers who back one parent over another and instill in a child that its ok for you to not to visit your real mother for a weeks at a time because your father has something planned and/or she is not following the rules because she hugged you; its ok for you to call your step-parent mom; another teacher who divided her children from their father in the same systematic approach.   

If the father is a teacher/educator shouldn't he know better?  If its a CPSW and/or child psychologist shouldn't she know better? A community would most often answer yes, these are trusted members of our community, allowing for closed court rooms.  The overwhelming FACTS are no one can be considered a trusted member of society under due process of the law and these court rooms need to be open and our Judges need to be educated not only in the law, but in what is normal behavior and what is not. In NH under RSA 461:A contempt motion is suppose to be heard in 30 days; it hardly ever is parents wait months to get into court and the contempt is furthered because like the father above they are not reined in and we should be furious.

Reading this article about a memory expert's finding will help you understand better:
http://www.slate.com/articles/health_and_science/the_memory_doctor/2010/05/removable_truths.2.html

Unfortunately, this is not new the Soviets, Chinese and Korean Government have all participated in mind control experiments. The United States, is not any different and it has been uncovered in 16,000 pages of mind control documents as part of the CIA's financial history, found here: http://www.wanttoknow.info/mindcontrol However, "in 1956 the U.S Department of the Army published a report entitled Communist Interrogation, Indoctrination, and Exploitation of Prisoners of War"  the U.S Department of the Army (15 May 1956). (Pamphlet No. 30-101 ed.). U.S Gov't Printing Office. pp. 17 & 51.which called brainwashing a "popular misconception."  denying the public's right know to laws, because the release of U.S. materials can take up to 40 years we should be very concerned because they are seldom held accountable many times because they are dead by the time the realities are released.

I am just a Mom, but I understand oppression and I know the difference between right and wrong.  Children should have the right to be heard and Judges and others should be able to discern the above with the right questions.