"It is so easy to be confrontive without being informative; indignant without being intelligent; impulsive without being insightful." Neal A. Maxwell
http://www.nashuatelegraph.com/newsstatenewengland/960043-227/judge-dalianis-speaks-out-against-move-to.html
Wednesday, May 9, 2012
In this article: Judge Dalianis speaks out against move to give lower judges control over their courts and I have to agree the problem is there is NO consistency and what is Dalianis doing to ensure there is? When there still is none.
The point of the previously discussed amendment change discussed here: http://dmvc-results.blogspot.com/2012/05/concurrent-legislative-judicial-power.html is to place the administration of the courts under a compromise between the legislative and judicial branches. = Check and Balance
The way it should work and a "reasonable person" whether or not involved with the courts might get this concept; the Judicial branches proposes the rules if they the legislative branch not all lawyers on the Judicial Committee actually understand them and their inherent value to the system = then they stay.
What was that phrase ... Keep it Simple Stupid ... the point is apply some reasoning to the court rules and consistently applying them across the board to open the doors of Justice to everyone, not the elite few.
"Do not believe in anything simply because you have heard it. Do not believe in anything simply because it is spoken and rumored by many. Do not believe in anything simply because it is found written in your religious books. Do not believe in anything merely on the authority of your teachers and elders. Do not believe in traditions because they have been handed down for many generations. But after observation and analysis, when you find that anything agrees with reason and is conducive to the good and benefit of one and all, then accept it and live up to it." ~Buddha
In this article: Judge Dalianis speaks out against move to give lower judges control over their courts and I have to agree the problem is there is NO consistency and what is Dalianis doing to ensure there is? When there still is none.
The point of the previously discussed amendment change discussed here: http://dmvc-results.blogspot.com/2012/05/concurrent-legislative-judicial-power.html is to place the administration of the courts under a compromise between the legislative and judicial branches. = Check and Balance
The way it should work and a "reasonable person" whether or not involved with the courts might get this concept; the Judicial branches proposes the rules if they the legislative branch not all lawyers on the Judicial Committee actually understand them and their inherent value to the system = then they stay.
What was that phrase ... Keep it Simple Stupid ... the point is apply some reasoning to the court rules and consistently applying them across the board to open the doors of Justice to everyone, not the elite few.
"Do not believe in anything simply because you have heard it. Do not believe in anything simply because it is spoken and rumored by many. Do not believe in anything simply because it is found written in your religious books. Do not believe in anything merely on the authority of your teachers and elders. Do not believe in traditions because they have been handed down for many generations. But after observation and analysis, when you find that anything agrees with reason and is conducive to the good and benefit of one and all, then accept it and live up to it." ~Buddha
No comments:
Post a Comment