Public Integrity lost on Infamous Attorney General Delaney

"The mission of the Attorney General's department is to serve the people of New Hampshire with diligence, independence and integrity by performing the constitutional, statutory and common law duties of the Attorney General as the State's chief legal officer and chief law enforcement officer, to seek to do justice in all prosecutions, to provide the State with legal representation and counsel of the highest quality, to protect the State's environment and the rights of its consumers, and to provide supervision and leadership of New Hampshire law enforcement." or so it states on their website http://doj.nh.gov/

In an article on 4/9/12; http://www.unionleader.com/article/20120409/NEWS06/704099953 By TED SIEFER
Where all reader conments have been deleted lends support to the following:
This article brings forth the notion that:

Our government... teaches the whole people by its example. If the government becomes the lawbreaker, it breeds contempt for law; it invites every man to become a law unto himself; it invites anarchy. Author: Justice Louis Dembitz Brandeis

Attorney General Michael Delaney of NH was quoted in the above article as "criticizing a recently established legislative committee for asking questions and demanding answers from his staff" the redress of grievance committee has been looking into NH Citizens complaints for almost 5 years now; and has been trying to restore public trust and confidence in our public institutions, by following up numerous on citizen complaints, a great majority against the Attorney General's office for covering up their employees fraudulent activities.

Delaney would like the public to believe that asking his office for some accountability is in and of itself a strain.  Over the last year, the impact the Redress of Grievance Committee has had, has been little to none on qualifying "the State's effort to protect the health and safety of New Hampshire's children,” because Delaney refuses to be and/or refuses to hold his departments accountable to the public he is suppose to serve.  This failure could be because his position is not that of  an elected official but an appointment by a NH Governor.  Therefore it is unlikely that he will act as AG Coakley of Massachusetts with a Public Integrity Division that addresses: "Corrupt public employees ....Crimes that have a corrosive or harmful effect on public confidence in our government and other trusted institutions, including such crimes as perjury and obstruction of justice." http://www.mass.gov/ago/bureaus/criminal/the-public-integrity-division-folder/ which is why the Redress of Grievance Committee has come into existence and has in the last year been given the power to demand answers, accountability and under the leadership of Speaker O'Brien restore public confidence in areas such as Delany's Division for Children, Youth and Families (DCYF).

Delaney is also quoted as writing his employees are prohibited from responding to allegations against them/their departments activities "due to strict confidentiality rules, which “are important to protect our children and ensure the integrity of our child protection system.” However, and perhaps redundantly it would rather mean that the "Prohibition" is in fact to cover up his departments activities. The House voted last month "to grant subpoena power to committees, with the approval of the Rules Committee and the House speaker. The move was prompted by the grievance committee's efforts to get information from DCYF."

The reference in this article to Delaney and Speaker O'Brien "disputes in recent years" attempts to gloss over the fact that this division is unaccountable to the public they are suppose to serve and and in fact a menace to the children in their care who have been put into the foster care system not for their own benefit; but to benefit drug studies with the State as their warden giving consent, and to collect federal money that when looked at under the NH RSA 169-C can be seen as a multi layering scheme now invested in a non-profit the "Children's Trust Fund":

[RSA 169-C:39-c repealed by 2010, 195:3, effective on the date that the New Hampshire Children's Trust certifies to the secretary of state, the state treasurer, and the director of the office of legislative services that the trust has been formed as a private New Hampshire voluntary corporation and has been qualified by the Internal Revenue Service as a section 501(c)(3) entity.]

    169-C:39-c New Hampshire Children's Trust Fund. – 

Most notably the attorney general's refusal to participate and respond, comes after the Federal Government performed Audits that show they are NOT IN COMPLIANCE WITH FEDERAL LAW see http://www.acf.hhs.gov/.

Delaney objects to qualifying an answer to  “Under what DCYF policy does it state slandering parents and family members is allowed in order to place a child in foster care?” Which perhaps word to create friction in affect means "What practices are in place so that CPSW's are not fabricating evidence to meet their goal of placement?"  The "substantial commitment of state legal resources" is used to cover up the fraudulent and/or knowingly malicious acts of individual actors within DCYF.  Instead of correcting the many complaints brought to his attention, Delaney continues to engage in rhetoric to keep closed door proceedings that only protect his workers and deny due process to the families and children of NH for ulterior intent.

Support your state legislators who get paid a $100 a year and are going out of their way to protect your interests; write to your congressional state representatives to give them added support in their efforts to demand accountability! https://writerep.house.gov/writerep/welcome.shtml

People often say that, in a democracy, decisions are made by a majority of the people. Of course, that is not true. Decisions are made by a majority of those who make themselves heard and who vote - a very different thing. Author: Walter H. Judd

 

Two Little Boys - Child Protective Services - Nuclear Research performed on Children part 2

Reference to post on 4/8/12; an anonymous source provided me with the name of one of the homes in Massachusetts doing Nuclear Research on Children; looking down the hallway of hell.

The ominous view is that of the hallways now in decay of the Walter E. Fernald State School, in Waltham Ma. a school that was and is still publicly funded; experiments conducted on Children by representatives of Boston's Harvard University and MIT funded in part by the "Quaker Oats Company" resulted in http://tech.mit.edu/V117/N65/bfernald.65n.html a settlement of  1.85 million dollar's for "some" albeit not all the Children tested on; nor does it take into consideration that State Child Protection Service workers allowed children to be bribed and gave consent for the majority of residents to have the testing performed on them.

Wiki on the Fernald School quotes an unusually tame version of the events at the school http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Walter_E._Fernald_State_School#cite_note-MIT-8 the suit heavily went towards MIT as shown in their own coverage.  What this shows is that the records of Child Services were of course lost.  Just as the due process series in this blog shows they often do with documents that are incriminating towards them. 

Thanks to Governor Deval Patrick of Mass. this facility and it's long history of harming people will rightfully be put to rest; the PBS documentary "Front Wards, Back Wards" directed by W.C. Rogers describes some of the horrors going on in this facility, it's hard to believe some residents family's fought to keep this place open. To find out more about Unethical human experimentation go to http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Human_experimentation_in_the_United_States and cross reference your sources to reports finally released by the US government the extent of the research is staggering and we will find out about the current testing in 40 years if you do not speak up now and save countless lives. For further abuses check on the testing world wide by American pharmaceutical companies!  The results are sickening.

Oppression is always in the dreariest of places.....

                                              Keep asking questions the truth is closer than you think.   

Two Little Boys - Child Protective Services - History - FDR - Never Stop Questioning

While I would love to jump on the bandwagon with unhappygrammy's assessment of whether or not DCYF = Child Protective Services in New Hampshire is really changing, as shown in this site's article "changing for the better".

The source she is referring to, is put out by N.H. DCYF which is extremely good with their rhetoric of "we are doing it for the greater good" and all accounts show that the figures presented under the direction of Maggie Bishop are not just misleading, they are utterly false.  Statistics can be manipulated and the variables are huge; the report is indicative of not recent action but activity over the history of this state agency's existence since 1979.

"In 1835, the Humane Society founded the National Federation of Child Rescue agencies to investigate child maltreatment. In the late-19th century, private child protection agencies – modeled after existing animal protection organizations – developed to investigate reports of child maltreatment, present cases in court and advocate for child welfare legislation." Pecora et al. (1992), pp. 230-31; Petr (1998), p. 126.

Scary right? In 1944, while Hitler was committing unspeakable human experiments while exterminating an entire race, the US not having stepped up sooner to these offenses may have been, in part, due to the fact that the United States was conducting their own experiments. These experiments were practiced on our most vulnerable citizens, our children.  Children taken from parents or due to the depression families hoped they might be better cared for by their government, in foster care, after all FDR was to be trusted with all those "new deals"; but like his Manhattan project the Atomic Bomb and so many other scientific studies he allowed on humans his own American Citizens; we may soon find that the similarities between Hitler and FDR, do not end like so many historians have depicted.

How do I know about the experiments? For one, this letter from the U.S. Department of Energy  and the reports above clearly state that radiation testing was being done on children and only advised this tester that a committee under President Clinton was looking into whether or not the testing was done under appropriate ethical and scientific standards.  The Plutonium Files: America's secret medical experiments in the Cold War, by Eileen Welsome, Dial Press, c1999, New York, N.Y., ISBN 0-385-31402-7; her research indicates they sought out and feed radioactive material to mentally disabled children.  However, the child now an educated affluent adult that this letter is directed toward was not mentally disabled, he was simply a ward of the state; if that should matter. Furthermore it should enrage us that this site/source, also shows this testing was done not only to our most vulnerable citizens but in fact to a number of other citizens without their knowledge or consent.  There is over 1.6 million pages of classified records released by Secretary O'Leary on the testing alone.

Moreover, it wouldn't be until the National Research Act of 1974 and the Belmont Report that would require consent of those being tested on.  Of concern is that right now the consent for mind altering drug experimentation is being done on Children in this country because the consent comes from the Department of Child Protection Services since they are the wardens of the Child in the foster care system.  A Child that is a ward of any state could and in many cases is now be subjected to these types of dangerous tests.

Consequently, one would correctly assume FDR/America isn't as different from Hitler/Germany during that time period as we would like to believe and there is no reason to believe that Child Protection Services is giving out correct information based on their history and development under FDR.

The two strikingly similar little boys who inspired this article show that the one on the right, 70 years ago was abused by CPS, when his single mother Virginia Cutter due to the pressures of an unforgiving Swampscott, Massachusetts community and the military enlistment of a Barclay Clark, thought the State could better care for her child.  Luckily, for him Victoria Hogland would keep him safe, in Hopedale Massachusetts. Once, he was in her home and Victoria never allowed state workers near him again, knowing what they had done to him.

The other little boy, his grandson was abused by CPS when he was maliciously and fraudulently separated from his fit mother against her will, only 6 years ago and sent to live with his father as recommended by this State Agency and a CPSW Sylvia Gayle who then immediately asked her to take in another child since her son was going to be living with the father, even in spite of being deemed not the better parent for her own child.

Involved in the two year struggle of false allegations was a Tracy Roukey recently demoted, who did not advise the mother of her rights at first contact and a CPSW name Kris Geno no longer with the agency, who believes it is ok to help alienate children from their natural parents and her supervisor Tracy Gubbins. Had anyone of these individuals done an investigation in conjunction with their own protocols they would have found the entire case was based upon fraud, contrived by the Father  a special education teacher who hired a Susan Vonderheide Phd. to collaborate his story.

 As such they created; A mother who will never stop searching and exposing the truth and oppressive nature of this very corrupt agency, run by Margaret Bishop who thrives on creating chaos simply, because they are empowered by the United States Government.

"Learn from yesterday, live for today, hope for tomorrow. The Important thing is not to stop questioning."  Albert Einstein

         Part two facility where testing took place and is now taking place see:            
http://dmvc-results.blogspot.com/2012/04/two-little-boys-child-protective_09.html

America's Almost Invisible Problem

The stories contained throughout my blog are not new or confined to one State they are problems that are across the Country and they denied families the Civil Rights that are purported to be given to citizens of this Nation:

Amy Charron, Houston, Texas Mom
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=58T1WGjMOFk&feature=relmfu
Agrees, with me that it is more than unlikely that Senator Nancy Schaefer and her husband took their lives, Senator Schaefer was in the center of uncovering and exposing not only Georgia's indiscretion but that of an entire Nation.

This has more links to other families stories more than 630 from across the country will be providing their updates and cases.
http://www.lawlessamerica.com/index.php?option=com_content&view=article&id=811:lawless-americathe-movie-will-include-diane-booth-learn-how-the-us-government-kidnaps-children-and-puts-mothers-in-jail&catid=124:articles&Itemid=219

I will be providing more insight into the Department of Health and Human Services and other Government departments that have used these children for experiment's since the days of FDR. As the evidence unfolds, you, like myself will find it morally reprehensible and conscience shocking that these events are occurring in America, because they are increasing similar to those that have occurred under the Hitler regime and countless others in our world history.  The United Nations should be very concerned.

In the words of one of our Presidents Woodrow Wilson; "An invisible empire has been set up above the forms of democracy. ~"

Memory Engineering - Intentional Interference in Parental Custody - DCYF - The CIA - Due Process -

What the hell *$%@ is memory engineering? Can and do people present rewards and punishments to control peoples behavior. Of Course parent's do it all the time they reward their children when they go a good job in school they punish them by taking away computer time for bad behavior hitting another etc. By systematically rewarding a behavior, you could reinforce it.

Now take into consideration that Child Protective Services was created, in 1835, by the Humane Society (yes the one for animals) who founded the National Federation of Child Rescue agencies to investigate child maltreatment. In the late-19th century, private child protection agencies were modeled after existing animal protection organizations to advocate for children's welfare.Pecora et al. (1992), pp. 230-31; Petr (1998), p. 126.

So lets say we are training a dog to do tricks - the human society advocates systematically rewarding a behavior, to reinforce it. So did the theory behind "Gardner's" Parental Alienation Syndrome really only come about say "20" years ago? The answer would have to be NO, Child Protection Services workers advocate systematically rewarding a Child's behavior, to reinforce it. This brings us to the damage caused by those corrupt individuals which include some teachers to alter children's memory's.  How do they do that exactly?

Unfortunately, I have a very real scene that shows that while we reinforce good behaviors and that's normal - if we want a child to side with one parent over the other and the Father tells the child that you can not participate in your favorite sport of Track and Field because you "have to see" your Mother; or that you will not be able to come to our Summer home because you "have to see" your Mother; this now becomes a form of Child Abuse because you are systematically penalizing a child's behavior for wanting to see his mother (and/or viseversa) and then you are enforcing it by penalizing a child for wanting to see another parent. Children take their cues about how they should act, speak and react from the people who influence them the most; their parents. In the above scenario the Father. Now what is a child suppose to do it he attends the same school his Father teaches at? If that same father further limits this child's contact with the world around him by say not allowing him/her to give out their home phone number and/or  not allowing a cell phone; how does this child communicate with friends and realize that this is not rational behavior?

This is a type of programming that happens in many abductions of young children and it is INTENTIONAL INTERFERENCE with the parents relationship with that child.  Where does it stop? How does this child get to bond with his other parent, when the Courts give a teacher extra credit for simply being a teacher and that they couldn't possibly be brainwashing a child as presented and verified by others? Now, take a look at teachers across this country simply GOOGLE "teacher arrested" unfortunately these individuals in conjunction with the Child Protection Service Workers who back one parent over another and instill in a child that its ok for you to not to visit your real mother for a weeks at a time because your father has something planned and/or she is not following the rules because she hugged you; its ok for you to call your step-parent mom; another teacher who divided her children from their father in the same systematic approach.   

If the father is a teacher/educator shouldn't he know better?  If its a CPSW and/or child psychologist shouldn't she know better? A community would most often answer yes, these are trusted members of our community, allowing for closed court rooms.  The overwhelming FACTS are no one can be considered a trusted member of society under due process of the law and these court rooms need to be open and our Judges need to be educated not only in the law, but in what is normal behavior and what is not. In NH under RSA 461:A contempt motion is suppose to be heard in 30 days; it hardly ever is parents wait months to get into court and the contempt is furthered because like the father above they are not reined in and we should be furious.

Reading this article about a memory expert's finding will help you understand better:
http://www.slate.com/articles/health_and_science/the_memory_doctor/2010/05/removable_truths.2.html

Unfortunately, this is not new the Soviets, Chinese and Korean Government have all participated in mind control experiments. The United States, is not any different and it has been uncovered in 16,000 pages of mind control documents as part of the CIA's financial history, found here: http://www.wanttoknow.info/mindcontrol However, "in 1956 the U.S Department of the Army published a report entitled Communist Interrogation, Indoctrination, and Exploitation of Prisoners of War"  the U.S Department of the Army (15 May 1956). (Pamphlet No. 30-101 ed.). U.S Gov't Printing Office. pp. 17 & 51.which called brainwashing a "popular misconception."  denying the public's right know to laws, because the release of U.S. materials can take up to 40 years we should be very concerned because they are seldom held accountable many times because they are dead by the time the realities are released.

I am just a Mom, but I understand oppression and I know the difference between right and wrong.  Children should have the right to be heard and Judges and others should be able to discern the above with the right questions.

The High Cost of an Abusive United States Foster Care System

http://uspolitics.einnews.com/247pr/261786

"More than 500,000 children in the U.S. reside in some form of foster care. Within one year of their initial placement, at least 15 percent of them will experience neglect, abuse, or other harmful conditions." Ruth C. Stern

This press release shows why the foster care system in the United States is flawed. To get justice the release suggests the only way to obtain it, is to file a Civil Suit, a costly endeavor no less; this is where you are merely reimbursed with money for the harm done to your family and only if you can get a lawyer to represent you. In NH two of those lawyers were disbarred for pursuing DCYF. As a pro se litigant attending Law School and pursuing a Civil Suit against the State of New Hampshire, I am pretty sure they will try to Bar me there as well.

However, as a student I am very aware that “Too often students are given answers to remember, rather than problems to solve” Rodger Lewin; As a Student I resolve to solve the problems placed before me by a corrupt United States Government.

And I understand as, Margaret Carlson once said "As a columnist, I realize that whatever amount of corruption I expose, half my readers will block it out, although they may get a frisson of joy in the process."

Heres to the Joy!!

Divorce - Mothers - Families - Options to Retain your Home in NH

A divorce comes with a lot of expenses especially in NH if you obtained an Attorney who possibly raked you and/or the Courts dragged it out your case due to their marital master program. Feeling a bit overwhelmed? That feeling of being heavily burdened, mentally or physically, by troubles, adverse conditions, and anxiety; yeah that; that is oppression.

In many of the cases reviewed in this state; families struggle after the divorce most often it is women and children; it would be especially helpful if the court's provided resources for families in this situation but they do not.

Information they do not give families and should: NH Housing has a divorced loan program, which with certain qualifications can keep you and your family in your home and put your mind at ease during this often scary and difficult transition.

There is also help for the elderly see: http://www.gonhhfa.com/already-own-a-home/home-owner-programs or for more information about their programs call 1-800-649-0470 or email ownershipinfo@nhhfa.org

I will try to update more resources that may be beneficial; if you know of any others that could help families please feel free to post them; there are also fuel assistance programs in many communities check with your local 411.

A habitual disuse of physical forces totally destroys the moral; and women lose at once the power of protecting themselves, and of discerning the cause of their oppression.
Joel Barlow

With that in mind ladies, these types of programs are not welfare, nor are they a reason to be discouraged; it is an opportunity to help you get back on your feet and move forward - Mark Twain once said "I was seldom able to see an opportunity until it had ceased to be one."  So, get up! Brush yourself off, make a plan and see it through, nothing worth having is ever easy, take advantage of lessening the burden, and you will be surprised at the things you can accomplish!!!  

Women, we are stronger than they think and when pushed or our children are threatened in anyway we push back; be defiant take control and we will make a better tomorrow for Children.

There's places to go...

5. Due Process - Record Access order by Judge Kelly

STATE OF NEW HAMPSHIRE

DISTRICT COURT ADMINISTRATIVE ORDER 2004-04

MOTION FOR ORDER TO PERMIT ACCESS TO JUVENILE FILES

RETAINED BY THE DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES

The Motion for Order to Permit Access to Juvenile Files, having been considered by the undersigned Administrative Judge, is granted under the authority of Supreme Court Rule 54(5) in that the access requested will serve to enhance and improve the operation of the District Courts and provide for the expeditious disposition of similar cases throughout the District Court System.

The conditions of confidentiality outlined in the motion shall be strictly adhered to.

/s/ Edwin W. Kelly

Dated: July 22, 2004 Edwin W. Kelly

Administrative Judge

New Hampshire District Courts

April Fools Day and Deception

Be ware April Fools Day is here ... in some countries like over the boarder in Canada the practical jokes only go on till 12 noon; here in the United States its all day long. French speaking countries call it "Poisson d'avril' (literally "April's fish"), it appears to be a game played by children where you tape a fish to a persons back and yell "Poisson d'avril".
Being deceived is never fun???  The article below released by the Associated Press this past Friday morning shows it happens in the Art World as well as ... ,well, I guess it happens anywhere you can think of. 

In the 1900's a new term came out in America for the journalist, novelists, and critics much like myself who exposed corruption in the Government, politics, business and my personal favorite the Department of Health and Human Services; that unofficial but official name for those who expose fraud and push for accountability is "Muckraker" cute, right? kinda like they rake through the muck, it is also used for those watchdogs who seek out and publish the truth to push for reform.

Deception has its twists and turns and this article, that came out Friday, has some interesting twists by a rather accomplished artist; while gifted ,why not create your own work, why copy?   Just a bit to entertain you while you try to avoid 4/1/12; this unofficial holiday dates back to Chaucer's Canterbury Tales written and/or published in 1392, one of the characters Chauntecleer, is tricked by a .... yes a

click yes for more....

Child Switched at Hospital - Records disappear with DCYF

Below is a link to one of the many cases; I reviewed for State Legislators; the results of which show an encounter with the department of children youth and families and to no ones surprise the records that would collaborate and for which a grandparent is entitled to under NH RSA 169-C are refusing to release the records. 

Furthermore, during the course of the proceeding's against the mother, it should be abundantly clear to anyone reviewing the information that she could hardly have harm her child prior to taking her home from the hospital after her birth; consequently she was also refused records which would have proven the falsification's in taking her child away from her protective care.

Another, equally disturbing quality in this matter is the use of a Hitler like tactic to take the child away from the mother.  To the best of my recollection they didn't state that she hurt the child in any way.  They instead deemed and charge her with doing harm in the future. Some of your may recall Minority Report, with Tom Cruise where in the future a police unit is able to arrest murderers before they commit their crimes, it didn't play out well.  Now, DCYF's under the guise of being fortune tellers as well as social workers can guide the court into a the destruction of a family based purely on speculation of it happening in the future; seriously the mentality of some of these people is clearly unchecked for reality; much like Hitler.

Check here to see how this grandmother acquired evidence to show that the STATE OF NH wrongly took away her rights and those of her young daughter:
http://unhappygrammy-grandparentsblog.blogspot.com/2012/03/speak-up-nh-dot-knightly.html

4. Due Process - Historical turnaround In NH Court System

Use "Snark" definition included (see #1.), in your motion, as in the example below; and you will receive the fastest turnaround possibly ever in the NH Court System!! This motion  full copy in sec. "3. Due Process" was submitted to the Nashua Superior Court on Friday the 23rd of March 2012 just after 2:00pm date stamp on first page; just before 4:00pm that same day on a regular and not expedited motion it was ruled on allegedly by Justice Ryan somewhere within that 2 hour period before they close for the day and a weekend no less: (see document in #2) as shown on the 2nd page by his signature; where it also states cc: 3/26/12; and then on 3/26/12 as shown on the date stamp of the item being mailed; the motion and Justice's note were simply copied without a clerks note and deposited into the envelope and mailed. Now, that is historical diligence in the NH Court System.

(1.) snark·y/ˈsnärkē/
      Adjective: (of a person, words, or a mood) Critical; cutting; testy. More info   
      »Dictionary.com - Answers.com - Merriam-Webster - The Free Dictionary

Now, we're off to see the ... the Supreme Court of NH and possibly the United States 1st District Court; because of course the Court denied it, possibly because the law and rules of the Court itself very clearly states a parent is entitled to records in their court case (see #3 here); whether it's open or closed and possibly for some other unknown disclosed reason, I have to wonder if he or someone else even read it.
(2.) Order on Motion to Reconsider click here:
https://docs.google.com/open?id=0ByTPLCn0VjpSZDJtdzlNdU9ScGVBWFNSVVJTWFNzZw

(3.) Guidelines for Public Access to Court Records in New Hampshire:
http://www.courts.state.nh.us/rules/misc/misc-8.htm

In the end though history shows as stated by Antiphanes in or about about 408 to 334 BCE that in the course of things "Everything yields to diligence" so onward we go through the virtue of hard work; rather, than the sin of careless sloth.

Future or Considering Attorney's and/or History Enthusiasts - FREE TUITION

I have to express that my experiences at ACHLS, have been extraordinary.  The courses, experiences and discussion method have greatly impacted my writing abilities, focus, ability to reason and present a compelling argument at the spur of the moment. 

While the Tuition may be free to those who pass the entrance exam; to succeed you have to be dedicated, organized and often sleep deprived.  Most importantly, everyones life has moments of varied chaos, it's your resolution in meeting the challenges life throws your way, your commitment to be diligent  and a certain disregard for the conventional rules that will help you become an independent thinker who is able to act and take advantage of opportunities such as FREE TUITION at ACHLS to pursue your worthwhile endeavor.

It may surprise even you ... http://achls.org/   Questions for a student can email me at dmvc@comcast.net take the challenge you have nothing to lose and everything to gain.

FREE TUITION

The ACHLS Board of Trustees has announced the renewal of

FREE TUITION at ACHLS!

The recent press release announcing this news is as follows:

ACHLS ANNOUNCES FREE TUITION IN THE JUNIOR YEAR
AND HALF TUITION IN THE SENIOR YEAR

SALEM, NH -- The American College of History and Legal Studies (ACHLS) has announced that it will grant free tuition to qualified persons who start their junior year at ACHLS in 2012-13. Those who thereafter choose to spend their senior year (of 2013-14) at ACHLS instead of going to MSL in 2013-14 (or who are ineligible to go to MSL then), will have to pay only half tuition (or $5,000) in their senior year.

These tuition plans carry forward the plan begun in 2011-12: i.e., free tuition in the junior year and half tuition in the senior year for those who do not transfer to MSL after their junior year.

Michael Chesson, the Founding Professor and Dean of ACHLS, said that "The elimination of tuition during the junior year will tremendously assist students pursuing their undergraduate education. With the rising cost of tuition at other colleges, the ACHLS offers the alternative of a rigorous education, a convenient class schedule, and no cost to students in their junior year."

ACHLS is located in Salem, New Hampshire. For information about ACHLS, to schedule a visit, request further information, or to apply, visit www.achls.org -- email info@achls.org -- or call 603.458.5145.

NH Criminalization in relation to Sex Trafficking of minor's FAILS

Shared Hope. org (sho)

"New Hampshire’s trafficking in persons law criminalizes the sex trafficking of minors but requires an element of force even for children exploited through commercial sex acts." (sho) 

This crime is coercive in nature but the element of force is not described; children are manipulated and threatened into these rings and the language of the statute does not protect our children; and then it goes further and continues to victimize children through this language in the statute:

"Although the prostitution statute provides an affirmative defense for trafficking victims, juveniles may be subject to arrest and punishment for prostitution. " (sho)

The Department of Health and Human Services in New Hampshire is not doing enough to further laws to protect our children or those of our neighbors; as parents we need to get involved and push for laws that protect and and do not further victimize the victims of this heinous crimes.

Please get invovled http://www.capwiz.com/sharedhope/issues/alert/?alertid=61121356&type=LO no matter where you are nationally or internationally you can contact this program to get involved in a manner that you feel comfortable and get material to make changes in your community.

We worry about what a child will become tomorrow, yet we forget that he is someone today. ~Stacia Tauscher

Today we need to worry about our children so they can face tomorrow and be children for as long as possible. In "American" children only began to realize childhood with FDR's new deal "The Fair Labor Standards Act" of 1938.

This Act finally mandated that Children under the age of 18 cannot do certain dangerous jobs, like work 12-16 hours a day in a factory and it furthered that children under the age of 16 cannot work.  It took the deepest depression of the 20th century a depression which affected the entire world to obtain these rights for children; sadly they were not given these rights because it was the right thing to do, the extentsion of the school age for children to receive more education wasn't to enlighten and broaden our childrens minds it was simply done by legislators to preserve jobs for adults.

In this Country and around the world women and children still do not have equal protection under the law.  We need to change that.

A Victim Receives Justice - the media focuses on ...

http://www.nashuatelegraph.com/news/955112-196/man-sobs-protests-innocence-as-hes-sentenced.html

Wednesday, March 28, 2012 Man sobs, protests innocence as he’s sentenced for raping 13-year-old niece By PATRICK MEIGHAN Staff Writer John Parker covers his face in court during his appearance for a sentencing Wednesday, March 28, 2012.

We can be thankful that Judge Colburn and the Jury focused on the victim.

3. Due Process - Parent's Rights to records

In reference to my recent filing see post 3/22/12; It appears that the Rules of the Court of New Hampshire add further weight to the argument of obtaining records.


specifically:
VIII. Denial of Access. The clerk, after consultation with the presiding justice and Administrative Justice, may, for good cause shown, deny access to court records to any individual. Good cause shall include, but not be limited to, previous theft, destruction, defacement or tampering of records and refusal to comply with administrative regulations established in accordance with these guidelines.


IX. Access by Litigants. Subject to paragraph II, and unless otherwise ordered by the Presiding Justice for good cause shown, parties to any litigation and their attorneys shall have complete access to their case records at all reasonable times and under the conditions set forth in these guidelines.

It will be interesting to see how the motion for reconsideration is ruled on; mostly likely it will have to pushed through the NH Supreme Ct. and 1st District Ct.  an expense that deters most litigants, not to mention the rules for filing.  Well bring it on, the worst that can happen is that I will obtain more experience and be a better advocate in the future without practicing on anyone other than myself; with that said, I do believe I am right in this matter parents should have the same rights as murderers and be entitled to their records. 

Remembering Nancy Schaefer's Fight against corruption

Oppression is still strong in America - Ghandhi once said "What difference does it make to the dead, the orphans, and the homeless, whether the mad destruction is wrought under the name of totalitarianism or the holy name of liberty or democracy?"

The destruction of families by Child Protections Services in any given state matters; families are being torn apart and children who really need help are not receiving it.  Two years after Senator Schaefer's Death the problems and disclosures she fought against are still here and there are still unanswered questions about her death. 

Remembering Nancy Schaefer's resolve and not backingdown:

click for more on Nancy Schaefer's disclosures...

2. Due Process - Fair Trials for Parents?

While I can hardly be on the same level as a practicing attorney; it would seem to be that the language enclosed in this document, number 5., in this series ref: 3/22/12 post. Means that the legislators choose specific wording to ensure parents rights; wording the the Judicial Branch in New Hampshire is refusing to acknowledge.

Motion to Reconsider:
https://docs.google.com/open?id=0ByTPLCn0VjpSZHFYV2VmYVRTeE9xaC12UXJYM2kzQQ

1. Due Process - Lawlessness or substantiated Reasoning in New Hampshire ref post of 3/14/12

The Reason I have decided to post this type of information is so that others may benefit from unfortunate experiences as a pro se litigant in divorce and other proceedings. I was compelled to attend school as a paralegal solely to understand what had and continues to happen in cases involving Child Protection Services, and find out how fit mothers/parents could lose custody of their child(ren) based on false allegations. The evidence to prove this was and is in the possession of Child Services who as shown below in this case has refused to release it, until a court granted it in 2010.

Now that same court is denying access to evidence it ordered to be handed over; evidence that under NH RSA 169-C:25 I a. specifically gives a parent a right to. It appears to be because, I filed a Civil Suit against the State of New Hampshire Department of Children Youth and Families and Judge Bamberger and Marital Master Alice Love, the later who thankfully retired to one day a week, and others for falsifications in an official matter, intentional infliction of emotional distress, intentional interference in a parent/child relationship and a disregard towards allowing access to real evidence under Ross v. Gadwah, that a fact finder would rely in determining their child’s fate. It appears that the law says parents are entitled to due process, whether or not they get it, well that answer is behind closed doors and silenced by a Confidentiality clause - which opposes one's right to Free Speech; on this it appears the 2nd district agrees with me .

first amendment right to free speech, whether or not the information is contained in court records.   Stanfield v Florida Dep’t Children & Families, 680 So. 2d 231 (Fla. 3d Dist. Ct. App. 1997). 

I am continuing to attend school for legal studies to better understand the court system as I move forward in a Civil Suit against the State. I hope that with effective lobbying and case management that what happened in this case never happens to another family. I am hopeful that this journey will help others or at least bring attention to the injustices and lack of accountability that have occurred in closed door proceedings such as this one and many others. The more I work with the public and review materials in other cases, the more I am sickened by the Child Protective System and their blatant disrespectful attitudes towards ALL people as things to be controlled, rather than people to be helped.

Parents should not have to go to law school to find out years or even months later how severely their rights were abridged by any State Court System. In the matter below the mother requested discovery which Judge Bamberger ordered but when it was brought to his attention at a hearing in November 2007 by the Assigned Attorney, that they never paid, not only did he not enforce it, instead of a review hearing, it became a final hearing which Judge Bamberger dated to take effect a month later in December 2007, to give the father time to go to the Superior Court in order to block the mother from visitation with her child. Really, I was under the impression that:
                                                                                            click for further information

NH House Committees will have Subpoena Power - Update on Rule Change & Meaning

annmarietimmins of the concord monitor tweeted at 10:48 am today the following:

#NHHouse votes 241-114 to let cmttes or Speaker alone - not full House - to issue subpoenas to compel witnesses to testify. #nhpolitics

Thank you New Hampshire Legislator's

What this means is:

A rule change was made to establish a procedure for considering and issuing subpoenas. No subpoenas have issued and no request to issue a subpoena is before the Rules Committee, which now must authorize the issuance of a subpoena and can only do so following a public hearing.

NH Attorney General's Office covering for New Hamsphire DCYF: Speculation or Fact

Two recent motions indicate that Rebecca Woodard, attorney for the Civil Division of the New Hampshire Attorney Generals office is in fact covering for the Department of Children Youth and Families in New Hampshire by stating that they have now lost evidence, from an earlier case.

This is just another typical tool in their toolbox of not following court orders; one that must be mentioned here due to the threats made against the mother because she is pursuing not only custody, but a civil suit against the State of NH, DCYF.

These bullies (for lack of a better descriptive) expect the public to tolerate what they are doing; denying parent's rights and appeasement to the population by moderate expansion; as seen in the limitations of open courts New Hampshire. http://www.unionleader.com/article/20120313/NEWS06/703139979

The motions below contain just a brief overview of the discrepancies in an ever widening abuse ring call the Department of Children Youth and Families; they claim to be acting in the best interest of the child; when in fact they only act to preserve their own self serving interests.

1. The mother's motion for production of previously ordered court records which are held open for 7 years: https://docs.google.com/open?id=0ByTPLCn0VjpSLWNWS1J0UzBTaWVSbFhqZWt0QVBjUQ

2. The State's Objection to the mother's motion: https://docs.google.com/open?id=0ByTPLCn0VjpSV1J5WmRqNHNRcHVlTWE0R3JkSXROQQ 

3. The mother's response and objection to the State:
https://docs.google.com/open?id=0ByTPLCn0VjpSYzVDaG5UOTJSamFEcFUxaTBhSGFSdw

If you have been denied evidence in a proceeding with the State; please write to dmvc@comcast.net to voice your concern and be heard or feel free to leave a comment. If you want to know what your rights are go here http://www.gencourt.state.nh.us/rsa/html/indexes/search.html type in the type of case or an RSA # (RSA mean Revised Statue Annotated) this is the state site.

If you are involved in a DCYF case be sure to have a full motion ready such as in #1 to obtain all records in the matter to protect you and your family; moreover, use this case CRAWFORD v. WASHINGTON to push to be able to confront your anonymous accuser; you may find they are in fact imaginary.